Maddyness

Casper, de licorne à dernière catastrophe financière

Comments
Partager :
Up
Partie précédente
1 — Casper's IPO is officially a disaster
Partie suivante
Down
Maddyness
Up
Menu
Partie 1
Down
1 — Casper's IPO is officially a disaster
2 — Casper IPO: What Does It Mean For The Tech World?
3 — When did selling mattresses become a tech business?
4 — La ruée vers les marchés de capitaux privés
5 — Are unicorns finally extinct?
Technologies

Casper, de licorne à dernière catastrophe financière

Pepper Pepper Pepper
10619 - on fire  |  
Comments
Par Geraldine Russell - 14 février 2020 / 07H30

Chaque vendredi, dans sa revue de presse, Maddyness vous propose une sélection d’articles sur un sujet qui a retenu l’attention de la rédaction. Cette semaine, l'introduction en Bourse de Casper.

Casper's IPO is officially a disaster

L’info

Casper’s attempt at a public debut is becoming downright embarrassing. The mattress-in-a-box company dramatically slashed its initial public offering price, cutting its valuation and dimming hopes of a positive reception by investors. The company said Wednesday in a regulatory filing that it had cut its IPO target share price to $12 to $13 from $17 to $19. That values the company at around $500 million, down from the $705 million it valued itself at last week. At one point, Casper was valued at more than $1 billion. Its shares priced at the low-end, or $12, the Wall Street Journal reported. Lire l’article de CNN

Casper IPO: What Does It Mean For The Tech World?

Le décryptage

So what does the Casper IPO mean for the broader tech market? Well, of course, this deal may just wind up being a one-off. But then again, as seen with other high-profile offerings like Uber and Lyft, there does appear to be more skepticism. What’s more, the WeWork implosion is a stark reminder of how things can go off the rails. Simply put, the “growth at all costs” strategy is not in vogue right now—at least on Wall Street. Lire l’article de Forbes

When did selling mattresses become a tech business?

La question à 100 millions de dollars

Casper was a unicorn to private investors. To the public markets, it is only about a third of one. Despite what Casper says in its prospectus—that it brings “the benefits of cutting-edge technology, data, and insights directly to consumers,” that it is on the “cutting edge of sleep innovations,” that it has an app—Casper is not a technology business. It’s a sleek, direct-to-consumer company that smartly realized buying a mattress is an awful experience that could be made a little less awful with online purchases, free delivery, and free trials. It’s a middleman that sources its mattresses from a small number of manufacturers, at least one of whom also makes mattresses for Casper’s many competitors. Lire l’article de Quartz

La ruée vers les marchés de capitaux privés

L’analyse macro

Ces dix dernières années, la transition de l’investissement vers les fonds “passifs” a été fulgurante. Ces fonds investissent automatiquement dans les actions et obligations liquides, c’est-à-dire faciles à vendre ou à acheter. Les fonds passifs les plus prisés sont d’une taille colossale, gérés par des ordinateurs, leur actionnariat est très dilué et les commissions de courtage sont minimes. “Ces dix dernières années, la transition de l’investissement vers les fonds “passifs” a été fulgurante” Le boom de cet investissement passif a provoqué son antithèse : des investissements de niche, gérés par des professionnels, discrets, peu échangés et à commissions élevées. Les investisseurs institutionnels se jettent désormais tête première dans l’investissement privé, et tout particulièrement le capital-risque, le private equity et le marché privé de la dette. Les signes sont omniprésents. Les grands fonds de pension et les fonds souverains placent une part toujours plus importante de leurs actifs dans les marchés de capitaux privés. Lire l’article du Nouvel Économiste

Are unicorns finally extinct?

La conclusion ?

2019 was kind of a messy year for tech IPOs. It started well, but then it felt like everybody was rushing to “get out” before the economy went south or the window closed. We saw the rise and fall of big name brands, questioned business models that once made sense, and embraced a drive to more rational business models. I, for one, think this was actually a good thing. It was good because although 2019 was a year full of challenges, it was also a year of lessons to be learned. For the past couple of years, highly valued startups have been a bit like Icarus, flying too close to the sun and full of hubris and non-stop self-promotion about how they’ve been “crushing it.” Now, reality is setting in. With many companies previously chasing that mythical “unicorn” status, will 2020 be the year we answer the question: Are unicorns extinct? Lire l’article de VentureBeat

Par

Geraldine Russell

14 février 2020 / 07H30
mis à jour le 13 février 2020
Articles les plus lus du moment

Retrouvez toutes les mesures d'aide annoncées pour les startups

Business
Par Geraldine Russell - 09H30mercredi 25 mars 2020
Next

Comment bénéficier des prêts d'urgence garantis par l'État ?

Finance
Par Geraldine Russell - 11H23vendredi 27 mars 2020
Next
Business
Menu
Entrepreneurs
Menu
Finance
Menu
Innovation
Menu
Technologies
Menu
MaddyShop
MaddyShop
Agenda
Agenda
MaddyEvent
MaddyEvent
MaddyJobs
MaddyJobs
MaddyStudio
MaddyStudio
Search
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Articles les plus consultés
Les guides
Entreprises Structures d’accompagnement MaddyBasics
Maddyplay
Newsletter
À propos
Mentions Légales
Search
Nos services
Les catégories
Maddynews
Hmm... Il y a visiblement eu un soucis :(
Maddyness

Comme vous le savez, Maddyness est à la pointe de l'innovation.
Malheureusement il semble que votre navigateur ne le soit pas encore...

Pour une bonne expérience de navigation
(et être au top de la modernité) pensez à passer sur :
Chrome
Chrome
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Edge
Edge