Can you tell us a little about your own professional background?
I started my career in shopping centre development in Miami, where we were one of the first firms to really start using big data and technology to make decisions on acquisitions. I then moved over to London to work for a boutique consultancy focused on real estate, technology, and risk. There, we did a lot of work for big tech companies, as well as governments in emerging markets and large real estate owners and operators in Europe.
I learned a lot about the resistance to deploy innovations and technology in the industry that is real estate, and about the risks and complications different, less transparent geographies possess. After my MBA and a few startup and VC internships, I joined a venture studio in London that brought together government, corporates and startups to co-create “urban-tech” businesses that are aimed at improving cities and build out local innovation hubs.
During my journey, I was introduced to 2150 where the team was taking a more systemic approach to this problem of improving cities and where I felt could make more of an impact deploying capital to entrepreneurs that were far more capable at building businesses than I was.
Which industries are you working in?
The golden thread of my career has been the intersection of real estate and technology. At 2150, this is highly relevant, since the lion’s share of the companies we look at are either directly related to the built environment or in ancillary industries that interact with it such as energy, water and air quality, for example. We are hunting for the “gigacorns” in these areas that can mitigate one gigaton of CO2 per year, while being commercially viable.
What do you look for in a founder?
This has been repeated many times by many investors but the most important thing for me is that a founder clearly understands and can articulate the problem they are trying to solve and the customer they are serving (general market size).
As we primarily back Series A investments, a requirement for us is that the business has found product-market-fit, so the founders we come across for the most part do this well. However, this was far less common in my experiences with seed investing in earlier stage businesses, but it is still equally important for founders at that stage to make sure to have that part of their business/pitch clear.
What does your current portfolio look like?
We had our first close as a fund in February of this year so right now we can speak publicly about two investments we have made thus far, and we have a few more that we will share soon. CarbonCure has created a technology that makes concrete/cement (an industry responsible for 7-8% of CO2 globally) more sustainable by injecting CO2 back into the material, sequestering it and at the same time making the cement harder, which means less cement is needed to build the building.
We have also recently backed a company called Nodes & Links that has built a project management software for infrastructure projects that will greatly reduce the time/resources/waste required to build these incredibly resource-intensive mega-projects at a time when infrastructure spending is set to grow exponentially.
What makes 2150 different?
At 2150 we look to be problem-driven to really understand the biggest issues facing our planet and society and find solutions to them, rather than invest based on the “hype cycles” that often plague the venture capital industry. I think the diversity of thought across our team, with backgrounds in big tech, entrepreneurship, real estate, VC and soon environmental science, allows us to take a more holistic approach when we analyse business cases.
We also benefit from a group of future-looking LP’s that want to be enterprise customers for the businesses we back, allowing us to add value to our portfolio companies from day one. We are lucky to have an unbelievable advisory board behind us who we often lean on to provide deep industry and academic expertise and an extra set of eyes when we are trying to understand a business or problem more comprehensively.